Does mining actually earn more than DCA-buying the same asset?
Honest comparison of GPU mining vs DCA buying. DCA wins on coin count, but mining offers hardware resale, UK tax deductions, and forced accumulation.
Honest answer: on pure coin count, DCA wins. If you invest the same total amount (hardware + electricity) as a lump sum into buying coins, you will accumulate more coins. That's a mathematical fact. But coin count isn't the full picture.
On coins alone, DCA accumulates Infinity× more coins than mining. So why consider mining at all?
| Mining Advantage | Value | DCA Equivalent |
|---|---|---|
| Hardware resale | £16,800 back (60%) | Zero — if coins crash, investment lost |
| UK tax: AIA write-off | £28,000 equipment deduction | No deduction for buying crypto |
| UK tax: electricity | £10162 deductible expense | No deduction |
| Est. tax saving (20%) | ~£7632 | £0 |
| Multi-coin flexibility | 14 tokens, switch anytime | Locked to one asset |
| Forced accumulation | Mines daily regardless of fear | Most people stop in bear markets |
| Downside floor | Hardware + resale = never £0 | Total loss if coin dies |
Mining is the better choice when:
- You want downside protection (hardware retains ~60% value)
- You're a UK taxpayer who can claim AIA and expense deductions
- You want exposure to multiple tokens without picking winners
- You know you'd stop buying during a brutal bear market
- Electricity is cheap (£0.05/kWh or less — solar/off-grid)
DCA is the better choice when:
- You have genuine iron discipline through multi-year downturns
- Electricity is expensive (UK Grid £0.26/kWh)
- You have no interest in hardware management
- You want maximum coin accumulation above all else
